Oh and Zach Randolph is hustlin'...never thought I would see that




flipmeister wrote:KyleCleric wrote:nope. it's impossible.![]()
I'l be surprised when I see Curry running

MikeDead wrote:Knicks....Defense?!...SHENANIGANS!



vblade2003 wrote:D'Antoni doesn't know the meaning of defense.
vblade2003 wrote:D'Antoni doesn't know the meaning of defense.
KyleCleric wrote:vblade2003 wrote:D'Antoni doesn't know the meaning of defense.
D'Antoni + Knicks will NEVER EVER equal defense.
Utah - Deron == crummy team

arkanekidd wrote:no I am serious...I saw them play team D in the 3rd...QRich playing help D!!! Nate Robinson had 4 steals...the knicks are fun to watch this season offensively too...Chris Duhon is a great role player...
Oh and Zach Randolph is hustlin'...never thought I would see that
Matty wrote:arkanekidd wrote:no I am serious...I saw them play team D in the 3rd...QRich playing help D!!! Nate Robinson had 4 steals...the knicks are fun to watch this season offensively too...Chris Duhon is a great role player...
Oh and Zach Randolph is hustlin'...never thought I would see that
New York playing defense? I dont beleive it, Prove it to me and i still wont beleive it.
Ok here's what really happened, new york was fumbeling around out on the court as they have been doing for years. Now the thing is, given enough time, the very unlikely is going to happen.
Qrich wasn't realy helping on D.. he was merely completely lost on the court and while he wondered around completely lost and confused on the court it looked as though he was helping on D, when in reality he had no clue what he ought to be doing. As unlikely as it seems, it's still more of a reasonable explanation that him actauly contributing to the team's defense..
Randolf husteling had nothing to do with basketball, at one point he'd noticed a fan under his team's basket had a hot dog and he went chasing it down- being easily distracted, byt the time he got down to that end of the court he'd forgot why he was there, looked around and on the opposite end of the court he saw a cute little girl with a pretzel.. so he rushed down to the other end of the court.. where he again was distracted and forgot his purpose in being there... this happened repeatedly and as unlikely as it sonds- his runnign down court just happened to coincide with the movement of the ball between the teams. Again, yes it sounds improbrable, but is still more likely than saying he was actauly husteling.
Nate didnt realy steal the ball 4 times.... in an unlikely series of events he continues to find himself in close proximeity of whoever had the ball- and he noticed what well manucured cubicles the guys had.... wanting a closer look he kept trying to grab the players hand's which made the guy nervous, and being that many people still have a healthy dose of homophobia left in them, the player (misinterpeting nates actions) gave nate the ball to play with hoping to end what seemed to him to be a very akward situation- it just looked like Nate was stealing the ball.
Despite what it looked like, this is what happened. To suggest the alternative, is misguided, dilusional and highly inaccurete. I mean it's good for a laugh or two, but very misleading and not very good journalism.
Matty wrote:i'm counting it too

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
