Knicks playing team D

Knicks playing team D

Postby arkanekidd on Sun Nov 09, 2008 4:17 pm

no I am serious...I saw them play team D in the 3rd...QRich playing help D!!! Nate Robinson had 4 steals...the knicks are fun to watch this season offensively too...Chris Duhon is a great role player...


Oh and Zach Randolph is hustlin'...never thought I would see that :man4:
Image
User avatar
arkanekidd

 
Posts: 4594
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:57 pm

Postby KyleCleric on Sun Nov 09, 2008 4:28 pm

nope. it's impossible. :man10:
Sacramento Kings
1998-1999: 54-28, Division Title, Round 2
1999-2000: 67-15, Division Title, Conference Finals
User avatar
KyleCleric

 
Posts: 8990
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:36 am
Location: Boston

Postby flipmeister on Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:24 am

KyleCleric wrote:nope. it's impossible. :man10:
:man10:

I'l be surprised when I see Curry running :man10:
User avatar
flipmeister

 
Posts: 2047
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 8:42 am
Location: Belgium

Postby KyleCleric on Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:26 am

flipmeister wrote:
KyleCleric wrote:nope. it's impossible. :man10:
:man10:

I'l be surprised when I see Curry running :man10:


Curry has been setting next to James. :man10:
Sacramento Kings
1998-1999: 54-28, Division Title, Round 2
1999-2000: 67-15, Division Title, Conference Finals
User avatar
KyleCleric

 
Posts: 8990
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:36 am
Location: Boston

Postby MikeDead on Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:28 am

Knicks....Defense?!...SHENANIGANS!
User avatar
MikeDead

 
Posts: 13796
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 11:11 am
Location: Cambridge, Massachusetts

Postby KyleCleric on Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:29 am

MikeDead wrote:Knicks....Defense?!...SHENANIGANS!
:clap:
Sacramento Kings
1998-1999: 54-28, Division Title, Round 2
1999-2000: 67-15, Division Title, Conference Finals
User avatar
KyleCleric

 
Posts: 8990
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:36 am
Location: Boston

Postby vblade2003 on Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:34 am

D'Antoni doesn't know the meaning of defense. :man10:
The Memphis Grizzlies GM
S1: 21-61, #4 overall pick, drafted AK-47
User avatar
vblade2003

 
Posts: 1680
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 11:31 pm

Postby MikeDead on Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:37 am

vblade2003 wrote:D'Antoni doesn't know the meaning of defense. :man10:


His entire game plan.

"Okay guys, we are gonna run, and the second we cross half court, start shooting!, if you take more then 5 seconds off the shot clock, BENCH!"
User avatar
MikeDead

 
Posts: 13796
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 11:11 am
Location: Cambridge, Massachusetts

Postby KyleCleric on Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:37 am

vblade2003 wrote:D'Antoni doesn't know the meaning of defense. :man10:


D'Antoni + Knicks will NEVER EVER equal defense.

Utah - Deron == crummy team
Sacramento Kings
1998-1999: 54-28, Division Title, Round 2
1999-2000: 67-15, Division Title, Conference Finals
User avatar
KyleCleric

 
Posts: 8990
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:36 am
Location: Boston

Postby vblade2003 on Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:43 am

KyleCleric wrote:
vblade2003 wrote:D'Antoni doesn't know the meaning of defense. :man10:


D'Antoni + Knicks will NEVER EVER equal defense.

Utah - Deron == crummy team


Yeah, not really sure why they're making such a big deal of beating a Deron-less team by seven points or whatever it was.
The Memphis Grizzlies GM
S1: 21-61, #4 overall pick, drafted AK-47
User avatar
vblade2003

 
Posts: 1680
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 11:31 pm

Re: Knicks playing team D

Postby Matty on Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:58 am

arkanekidd wrote:no I am serious...I saw them play team D in the 3rd...QRich playing help D!!! Nate Robinson had 4 steals...the knicks are fun to watch this season offensively too...Chris Duhon is a great role player...


Oh and Zach Randolph is hustlin'...never thought I would see that :man4:


New York playing defense? I dont beleive it, Prove it to me and i still wont beleive it.

Ok here's what really happened, new york was fumbeling around out on the court as they have been doing for years. Now the thing is, given enough time, the very unlikely is going to happen.

Qrich wasn't realy helping on D.. he was merely completely lost on the court and while he wondered around completely lost and confused on the court it looked as though he was helping on D, when in reality he had no clue what he ought to be doing. As unlikely as it seems, it's still more of a reasonable explanation that him actauly contributing to the team's defense..

Randolf husteling had nothing to do with basketball, at one point he'd noticed a fan under his team's basket had a hot dog and he went chasing it down- being easily distracted, byt the time he got down to that end of the court he'd forgot why he was there, looked around and on the opposite end of the court he saw a cute little girl with a pretzel.. so he rushed down to the other end of the court.. where he again was distracted and forgot his purpose in being there... this happened repeatedly and as unlikely as it sonds- his runnign down court just happened to coincide with the movement of the ball between the teams. Again, yes it sounds improbrable, but is still more likely than saying he was actauly husteling.

Nate didnt realy steal the ball 4 times.... in an unlikely series of events he continues to find himself in close proximeity of whoever had the ball- and he noticed what well manucured cubicles the guys had.... wanting a closer look he kept trying to grab the players hand's which made the guy nervous, and being that many people still have a healthy dose of homophobia left in them, the player (misinterpeting nates actions) gave nate the ball to play with hoping to end what seemed to him to be a very akward situation- it just looked like Nate was stealing the ball.

Despite what it looked like, this is what happened. To suggest the alternative, is misguided, dilusional and highly inaccurete. I mean it's good for a laugh or two, but very misleading and not very good journalism.
User avatar
Matty

 
Posts: 3065
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 5:20 pm

Re: Knicks playing team D

Postby KyleCleric on Mon Nov 10, 2008 11:05 am

Matty wrote:
arkanekidd wrote:no I am serious...I saw them play team D in the 3rd...QRich playing help D!!! Nate Robinson had 4 steals...the knicks are fun to watch this season offensively too...Chris Duhon is a great role player...


Oh and Zach Randolph is hustlin'...never thought I would see that :man4:


New York playing defense? I dont beleive it, Prove it to me and i still wont beleive it.

Ok here's what really happened, new york was fumbeling around out on the court as they have been doing for years. Now the thing is, given enough time, the very unlikely is going to happen.

Qrich wasn't realy helping on D.. he was merely completely lost on the court and while he wondered around completely lost and confused on the court it looked as though he was helping on D, when in reality he had no clue what he ought to be doing. As unlikely as it seems, it's still more of a reasonable explanation that him actauly contributing to the team's defense..

Randolf husteling had nothing to do with basketball, at one point he'd noticed a fan under his team's basket had a hot dog and he went chasing it down- being easily distracted, byt the time he got down to that end of the court he'd forgot why he was there, looked around and on the opposite end of the court he saw a cute little girl with a pretzel.. so he rushed down to the other end of the court.. where he again was distracted and forgot his purpose in being there... this happened repeatedly and as unlikely as it sonds- his runnign down court just happened to coincide with the movement of the ball between the teams. Again, yes it sounds improbrable, but is still more likely than saying he was actauly husteling.

Nate didnt realy steal the ball 4 times.... in an unlikely series of events he continues to find himself in close proximeity of whoever had the ball- and he noticed what well manucured cubicles the guys had.... wanting a closer look he kept trying to grab the players hand's which made the guy nervous, and being that many people still have a healthy dose of homophobia left in them, the player (misinterpeting nates actions) gave nate the ball to play with hoping to end what seemed to him to be a very akward situation- it just looked like Nate was stealing the ball.

Despite what it looked like, this is what happened. To suggest the alternative, is misguided, dilusional and highly inaccurete. I mean it's good for a laugh or two, but very misleading and not very good journalism.


max
Sacramento Kings
1998-1999: 54-28, Division Title, Round 2
1999-2000: 67-15, Division Title, Conference Finals
User avatar
KyleCleric

 
Posts: 8990
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:36 am
Location: Boston

Postby Matty on Mon Nov 10, 2008 2:18 pm

i'm counting it too :man13:
User avatar
Matty

 
Posts: 3065
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 5:20 pm

Postby arkanekidd on Mon Nov 10, 2008 2:38 pm

not like it was the only game they did it...it's been happening. the knicks are good! :man10:
Image
User avatar
arkanekidd

 
Posts: 4594
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:57 pm

Postby KyleCleric on Mon Nov 10, 2008 4:19 pm

Matty wrote:i'm counting it too :man13:


oky doky :man10:
Sacramento Kings
1998-1999: 54-28, Division Title, Round 2
1999-2000: 67-15, Division Title, Conference Finals
User avatar
KyleCleric

 
Posts: 8990
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:36 am
Location: Boston


Return to NBA Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron
Advertise Here | Privacy Policy | ©2008 Sculu Sports. Come Strong.