watch out for philly

Post a reply

watch out for philly

Postby arkanekidd on Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:57 pm

their gonna sign brand :man1:
Image
User avatar
arkanekidd

 
Posts: 4594
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:57 pm
Top

Postby arkanekidd on Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:12 am

contenders they are :man1:
Image
User avatar
arkanekidd

 
Posts: 4594
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:57 pm
Top

Postby KyleCleric on Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:51 am

arkanekidd wrote:contenders they are :man1:


they have the potential to be good. contenders? they need a lot to go right for that to be the case (like the collapse of both the Pistons and Celtics as well as team chemistry and great team defense).
Sacramento Kings
1998-1999: 54-28, Division Title, Round 2
1999-2000: 67-15, Division Title, Conference Finals
User avatar
KyleCleric

 
Posts: 8990
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:36 am
Location: Boston
Top

Postby arkanekidd on Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:23 pm

KyleCleric wrote:
arkanekidd wrote:contenders they are :man1:


they have the potential to be good. contenders? they need a lot to go right for that to be the case (like the collapse of both the Pistons and Celtics as well as team chemistry and great team defense).


they have defense, they have depth, all they need is chemistry, and now they get a guy who plays with intensity like brand :man1: :man1: :man1:
Image
User avatar
arkanekidd

 
Posts: 4594
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:57 pm
Top

Postby KyleCleric on Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:30 pm

arkanekidd wrote:
KyleCleric wrote:
arkanekidd wrote:contenders they are :man1:


they have the potential to be good. contenders? they need a lot to go right for that to be the case (like the collapse of both the Pistons and Celtics as well as team chemistry and great team defense).


they have defense, they have depth, all they need is chemistry, and now they get a guy who plays with intensity like brand :man1: :man1: :man1:


we'll see. The Andre Miller/Elton Brand experiment didn't work the first time when they were both in their prime. Iguodala/Brand is no Pierce/KG combination. They still look like 3rd best team in the division, but are probably now a 5th seed in the playoffs.
Sacramento Kings
1998-1999: 54-28, Division Title, Round 2
1999-2000: 67-15, Division Title, Conference Finals
User avatar
KyleCleric

 
Posts: 8990
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:36 am
Location: Boston
Top

Postby goldnblue83 on Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:35 pm

Miller = Billups
Green << Rip
Iggy > Prince
Brand >> Dice
Sam < Sheed


Williams, T-young , Speights, Smith > Stuckey, Maxiell, Garbage
User avatar
goldnblue83

 
Posts: 2384
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 7:19 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Top

Postby KyleCleric on Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:39 pm

goldnblue83 wrote:Miller = Billups
Green << Rip
Iggy > Prince
Brand >> Dice
Sam < Sheed


Williams, T-young , Speights, Smith > Stuckey, Maxiell, Garbage


Chemistry
Detroit>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Philly :man10:

the Detroit bench of Stuckey and Maxiell is better than the Philly bench. Billups is better point guard than Miller. Prince would probably negate Iggy with his defense.
Sacramento Kings
1998-1999: 54-28, Division Title, Round 2
1999-2000: 67-15, Division Title, Conference Finals
User avatar
KyleCleric

 
Posts: 8990
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:36 am
Location: Boston
Top

Postby arkanekidd on Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:42 pm

KyleCleric wrote:
goldnblue83 wrote:Miller = Billups
Green << Rip
Iggy > Prince
Brand >> Dice
Sam < Sheed


Williams, T-young , Speights, Smith > Stuckey, Maxiell, Garbage


Chemistry
Detroit>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Philly :man10:

the Detroit bench of Stuckey and Maxiell is better than the Philly bench. Billups is better point guard than Miller. Prince would probably negate Iggy with his defense.


stuckey is a star. but young is going to develop into a solid player too. why cant philly's chemistry come together???? :man3:

its not like they have marbury or zach randolph...
Image
User avatar
arkanekidd

 
Posts: 4594
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:57 pm
Top

Postby KyleCleric on Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:46 pm

arkanekidd wrote:
KyleCleric wrote:
goldnblue83 wrote:Miller = Billups
Green << Rip
Iggy > Prince
Brand >> Dice
Sam < Sheed


Williams, T-young , Speights, Smith > Stuckey, Maxiell, Garbage


Chemistry
Detroit>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Philly :man10:

the Detroit bench of Stuckey and Maxiell is better than the Philly bench. Billups is better point guard than Miller. Prince would probably negate Iggy with his defense.


stuckey is a star. but young is going to develop into a solid player too. why cant philly's chemistry come together???? :man3:

its not like they have marbury or zach randolph...


i think i was saying a lot more about Detroit's chemistry than Philly's.
Sacramento Kings
1998-1999: 54-28, Division Title, Round 2
1999-2000: 67-15, Division Title, Conference Finals
User avatar
KyleCleric

 
Posts: 8990
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:36 am
Location: Boston
Top

Postby goldnblue83 on Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:47 pm

KyleCleric wrote:Chemistry
Detroit>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Philly


After failing yet again there have been alot of talks about dealing some of there core players, especially Sheed who is probably brings everyone together more than anyone else on the team.
User avatar
goldnblue83

 
Posts: 2384
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 7:19 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Top

Postby arkanekidd on Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:54 pm

i think you were just plain flat out wrong...
Image
User avatar
arkanekidd

 
Posts: 4594
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:57 pm
Top

Postby KyleCleric on Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:58 pm

arkanekidd wrote:i think you were just plain flat out wrong...


we will see. the sixers look to me like a 45, maybe 50 win team.
Sacramento Kings
1998-1999: 54-28, Division Title, Round 2
1999-2000: 67-15, Division Title, Conference Finals
User avatar
KyleCleric

 
Posts: 8990
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:36 am
Location: Boston
Top

Postby arkanekidd on Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:58 pm

KyleCleric wrote:
arkanekidd wrote:i think you were just plain flat out wrong...


we will see. the sixers look to me like a 45, maybe 50 win team.


wrong as usual
Image
User avatar
arkanekidd

 
Posts: 4594
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:57 pm
Top

Postby KyleCleric on Thu Jul 10, 2008 12:00 am

arkanekidd wrote:
KyleCleric wrote:
arkanekidd wrote:i think you were just plain flat out wrong...


we will see. the sixers look to me like a 45, maybe 50 win team.


wrong as usual


i'm not often wrong ... well ... not often wrong by much. I did underestimate the Celtics. I thought 65 wins, but it was 66.
Sacramento Kings
1998-1999: 54-28, Division Title, Round 2
1999-2000: 67-15, Division Title, Conference Finals
User avatar
KyleCleric

 
Posts: 8990
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:36 am
Location: Boston
Top

Postby arkanekidd on Thu Jul 10, 2008 12:00 am

KyleCleric wrote:
arkanekidd wrote:
KyleCleric wrote:
arkanekidd wrote:i think you were just plain flat out wrong...


we will see. the sixers look to me like a 45, maybe 50 win team.


wrong as usual


i'm not often wrong ... well ... not often wrong by much. I did underestimate the Celtics. I thought 65 wins, but it was 66.


see. you were wrong.
Image
User avatar
arkanekidd

 
Posts: 4594
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:57 pm
Top
Post a reply

Return to Celtics Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

More NBA Forums

NFL Forums
cron
Advertise Here | Privacy Policy | ©2008 Sculu Sports. Come Strong.